We see daily examples of pressures on press freedom in countries around the globe. Then there is a particularly chilling moment when such pressure becomes an overt threat from one of the oldest democracies in the world, in which freedom of speech is enshrined as the first amendment to its Constitution.

As highlighted in a recent statement by WACC North America, on March 14, Brendan Carr, Chair of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wrote a social media post on X, in response to President Trump’s complaint that media outlets were reporting negatively on his war efforts in Iran that, “broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions – also known as the fake news – have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up.”

He further threatened that broadcasters are in danger of having their licenses revoked if they do not operate in the public interest, saying, “the law is clear.”

The WACC North America statement is strong and clear in defending the rights guaranteed in the First Amendment, and in the public interest of the media’s coverage of the war, stating: “A government that cannot be scrutinized in this way is neither of the people, nor for the people.”

The statement also notes that WACC has long documented the erosion of media freedom in authoritarian states and fragile democracies across the world. The tactics are numbingly familiar: regulatory pressure, licence threats, the weaponisation of “fake news” as a label to delegitimise unflattering coverage. What is new – and urgently alarming – is that these same tactics are now being deployed in Washington DC.

Media freedom is not a regional concern. It is the connective tissue of democratic life everywhere. When one nation normalises the use of regulatory bodies to intimidate journalists, it hands a playbook to governments around the world that were already looking for permission to do the same.

The United States has historically used its global influence to pressure other nations toward press freedom. If that influence is now exercised in the opposite direction, the consequences will be felt far beyond American borders.

The call from WACC-NA to affirm and protect constitutional press freedoms is not partisan – it is foundational. Across the political spectrum, across faiths and traditions, a free and independent press is one of the few institutions that serves everyone. The moment it becomes an instrument of state approval, it serves no one.

This is the moment for voices everywhere – faith communities, civil society, international bodies – to speak clearly.

The freedom of the press is under active, escalating threat. It demands an urgent, unified, and global response. Be vigilant wherever you are. Speak Out. Resist authoritarian pressures to censor the press. Defend and support media freedom in every way you can. 

Photo: Loredana Sangiuliano/Shutterstock