<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sarah Macharia | Centre for Communication Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ccrvoices.org/tag/sarah-macharia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ccrvoices.org</link>
	<description>The WACC learning &#38; research platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 18:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">172886122</site>	<item>
		<title>Reclaiming the rings: Why Olympic broadcasting rights need a rethink</title>
		<link>https://ccrvoices.org/2024/08/06/reclaiming-the-rings-why-olympic-broadcasting-rights-need-a-rethink/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terri Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 18:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Macharia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ccrvoices.org/?p=5970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The&#160;2024 Summer Olympics – or the XXXIII Olympiad – are finally here! Whether you, or I, get to watch any of the games, livestreamed and in full, is a separate issue. Those of us old enough to remember will recall a time when the Olympics were readily accessible on free-to-air television. The delight of watching [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The&nbsp;2024 Summer Olympics – or the XXXIII Olympiad – are finally here! Whether you, or I, get to watch any of the games, livestreamed and in full, is a separate issue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those of us old enough to remember will recall a time when the Olympics were readily accessible on free-to-air television. The delight of watching one’s country’s Olympians dominate the long-distance races, overlap competitors more than once and sweep the podium, was palpable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Following the games at no extra cost on live television is a thing of past for many, thanks to that complication called broadcasting rights and the in-country monopoly of rights’ holders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial policy the International Olympic Committee (IOC) adopted four decades ago to increase revenue and diversify resources through sale of broadcasting rights has been so hugely successful that watching the games has become the purview of the privileged few.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), the <a href="https://www.wipo.int/web/sports/broadcasting" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">sale of broadcasting and media rights</a> is the biggest source of revenue for sports organisations. For the IOC, <a href="https://olympics.com/ioc/funding" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">sales of broadcasting rights</a> accounted for 61% of its USD 7.6 billion revenue during the period 2017–2020/21.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WIPO cites <a href="https://www.wipo.int/web/sports/broadcasting" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">three justifications for broadcasters&#8217; rights</a>: “safeguard costly investments in televising sporting events, recognize and reward the entrepreneurial efforts of broadcasting organizations, and recognize and reward their contribution to diffusion of information and culture.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That Olympics broadcasting is restricted to select media organisations in each country that in turn exercise control over what content to air and how, is at odds with the IOC’s commitment as stated in Clause 48 of the <a href="https://olympics.com/ioc/olympic-charter" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Olympic Charter</a> to take “all necessary steps in order to ensure the fullest coverage by the different media and the widest possible audience in the world for the Olympic Games.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, the Charter stipulates that “[o]nly those persons accredited as media may act as journalists, reporters or in any other media capacity.” Video clips posted on YouTube by the Olympians themselves or enthusiastic others are deleted as swiftly as they are published.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The IOC’s financial health is important. The current revenue-generation model, however, has created tiers of audiences across and within nations. It has built and continued to reinforce inequalities in access to content particularly in countries where broadcasting rights are unaffordable or infrastructure is inadequate. It has stifled interest in what was once an exciting and unifying once-every-four-years phenomenon. The model is arguably out of touch with the contemporary digital media reality where content creation is as easy as click-and-post.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is time for the IOC to return to the drawing board, to bring its approach to broadcasting rights in line with its mandate and the Olympic spirit.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-right wp-block-paragraph"><em>Photo: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/thedcms/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport on Flickr</a>, <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CC BY 2.0</a>, filter added.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5970</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SaferInternetDay: Here’s to a misogyny-free Internet</title>
		<link>https://ccrvoices.org/2023/02/06/saferinternetday-heres-to-a-misogyny-free-internet/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saskia Rowley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 04:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender cyberviolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Macharia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ccrvoices.org/?p=4232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The message to end misogyny, sexual harassment and gender-based violence in the digital realm has been iterated and reiterated countless times in as many spaces and languages the world over. Yet, there still lacks global consensus on what constitutes such behaviour. Related to the absence of an agreed definition, neither at international nor at national [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The message to end misogyny, sexual harassment and gender-based violence in the digital realm has been iterated and reiterated countless times in as many spaces and languages the world over. Yet, there still lacks global consensus on what constitutes such behaviour. Related to the absence of an agreed definition, neither at international nor at national levels has a comprehensive policy framework been developed to address online sexual harassment.</p>
<p>Most people around the world, especially those in rural, poor and marginalized areas, experience the Internet largely through social media, on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok and other platforms. According to the Internet usage rate worldwide as of 2022, by gender and market maturity, from Statista, women make up a sizeable proportion of the networked population, nearly at par with men in wealthy nations to four out of ten Internet users in the poorest regions.</p>
<p>Juxtapose this fact with the unbounded misogyny thriving in online communities, unfettered by all measures to contain and eradicate it, and propelled by individuals such as the <a href="https://www.cnet.com/culture/andrew-tate-the-arrest-greta-thunberg-feud-and-everything-else-you-need-to-know" target="_blank" rel="noopener">self-described misogynist Andrew Tate</a> with his over 4.5 million followers on Twitter alone or  groups such as <a href="https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/homme-choc-senegal-misogyny-women-abuse-rape-facebook/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Homme Choc on Facebook</a> where men bond over hatred of women. Almost nine out of ten girls and women Internet users know first-hand what it feels like: <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/gpc/briefing-room/2022/03/18/launching-the-global-partnership-for-action-on-gender-based-online-harassment-and-abuse/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Targeted harassment and abuse, gendered disinformation, the non-consensual distribution of intimate images and the creation of deep fakes</a>.</p>
<p>Safer Internet Day (SID) on February 7 was established to “<a href="https://www.saferinternetday.org/about" target="_blank" rel="noopener">raise awareness of emerging online issues and current concerns</a>.” Online safety issues tend to more often than not, be gender-based, targeting girls, women, gender and sexual minorities disproportionately. This SID, do what you can to advance a misogyny-free Internet.</p>
<h3>Get Involved</h3>
<p>Visit the <a href="https://www.saferinternetday.org/in-your-country" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Safer Internet Day website</a> to find ideas on how to advance a misogyny-free Internet.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><em>Photo: Rana Hamid</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4232</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
